🔗 Share this article

McLaren along with Formula One would benefit from any conclusive outcome during this title fight between Norris & Oscar Piastri getting resolved on the track and without resorting to team orders as the title run-in begins this weekend at Circuit of the Americas starting Friday.

Marina Bay race aftermath prompts team tensions

After the Singapore Grand Prix’s doubtless extensive and tense debriefs concluded, the Woking-based squad will be hoping for a fresh start. The British driver was almost certainly more than aware of the historical context regarding his retort toward his upset colleague during the previous race weekend. In a fiercely contested title fight with the Australian, that Norris invoked one of Ayrton Senna’s well-known quotes did not go unnoticed but the incident that provoked his comment differed completely to those that defined the Brazilian’s great rivalries.

“If you fault me for just going an inside move through an opening then you should not be in F1,” Norris said of his opening-lap attempt to pass that led to the cars colliding.

The remark appeared to paraphrase Senna’s “If you no longer go for a gap which is there you are no longer a true racer” defence he gave to the racing knight after he ploughed into the French champion in Japan in 1990, ensuring he took the championship.

Parallel mindset yet distinct situations

Although the attitude is similar, the wording marks where parallels stop. The late champion confessed he never intended of letting Prost to defeat him through the first corner whereas Norris did try to make his pass cleanly at the Marina Bay circuit. In fact, his maneuver was legitimate that went unpenalised even with the glancing blow he had with his team colleague during the pass. That itself was a result of him clipping the car driven by Verstappen in front of him.

Piastri reacted furiously and, significantly, instantly stated that Norris's position gain seemed unjust; the implication being the two teammates clashing was forbidden by team protocols of engagement and Norris ought to be told to give back the place he had made. McLaren did not do so, yet it demonstrated that during disputes between them, both will promptly appeal the squad to step in in their favor.

Squad management and fairness under scrutiny

This comes naturally of McLaren’s laudable efforts to allow their racers compete one another and strive to maintain strict fairness. Aside from tying some torturous knots in setting precedents over what constitutes just or unjust – which, under these auspices, now includes bad luck, strategy and racing incidents such as in Singapore – there remains the issue regarding opinions.

Most crucially for the championship, with six meetings remaining, Piastri leads Norris by twenty-two points, there is what each driver perceives as fair and at what point their opinion may diverge with that of the McLaren pitwall. That is when their friendly rapport between the two may – finally – turn somewhat into Senna-Prost.

“It will reach a point where minor points count,” commented Mercedes boss Toto Wolff post-race. “Then calculations will begin and re-calculations and I suppose the elbows are going to come out further. That's when it begins to get interesting.”

Viewer desires and championship implications

For the audience, during this dual battle, getting interesting will likely be appreciated as an on-track confrontation rather than a data-driven decision of circumstances. Especially since for F1 the other impression from all this isn't very inspiring.

Honestly speaking, McLaren is taking appropriate choices for themselves with successful results. They clinched their tenth team championship at Marina Bay (though a great achievement diminished by the controversy from their drivers' clash) and in Andrea Stella as squad leader they possess a moral and upright commander who genuinely wants to act correctly.

Sporting integrity versus squad control

Yet having drivers competing for the title looking to the pitwall for resolutions appears unsightly. Their competition ought to be determined through racing. Luck and destiny will have roles, but better to let them just battle freely and see how fortune falls, than the impression that every disputed moment will be analyzed intensely by the team to ascertain whether intervention is needed and subsequently resolved afterwards behind closed doors.

The scrutiny will intensify and each time it happens it risks potentially making a difference which might prove decisive. Previously, after the team made their drivers swap places in Italy due to Norris experiencing a slow pit stop and Piastri believing he had been hard done by regarding tactics at Hungary, where Norris triumphed, the spectre of a fear about bias also emerges.

Team perspective and future challenges

No one wants to witness a championship constantly disputed over perceived that fairness attempts were unequal. Questioned whether he believed the squad had managed to do right toward both racers, Piastri said he believed they had, but mentioned it's a developing process.

“We've had several challenging moments and we’ve spoken about a number of things,” he said after Singapore. “However finally it’s a learning process with the whole team.”

Six meetings remain. McLaren have little room for error to do their cramming, so it may be better now to simply close the books and step back from the conflict.