🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar discussions in additional member states